There’s no need to rebuild the whole thing (and restart the JVM) but to change the classpath env variable.
With Java compiled artifacts you’d point to the needed artifact in an env var. Doing builds over and over with AOT compilation will end up in big cloud provider bills. And each build downloaded every dependency from scratch!” - sourceīuild times are important, as CI can trigger a lot of them.īuild times can clog up the CI. Changed one LoC and pushed? Each build provisioned a temp Ubuntu instance to build the Docker image. “The CI for Node was very dumb because it generated like 50+ docker images, one for each microservice.
#JAVA REFLECTION PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT CODE#
So while Go compiles fast that was a lot of Azure/Github resources used for one potential code change.” - source Even so, they were building it 30 times for each architecture/platform combination. The build time was fast for a single architecture. “For example, I saw an open source project with Go. JIT compilation doesn’t compile all the paths upfront.
But in the meantime, they lack throughput.Įven though AOT compiled binary is faster at startup, it doesn’t beat JITted code in runtime. Native compilers win on the memory footprint. All these make folks think bytecode isn’t useful.
An extra layer could be avoided if native code is deployed. Also, you add an extra layer on top of the container. You’ll increase the memory footprint, as you need the JDK. Most would argue shipping bytecode and interpreting with JVM is a waste. Let’s see why JIT and JVM will stay relevant even in today’s cloud environment. And today we have other alternatives to compile to native code (Go). As JVM was built to interpret bytecode, not to run in a container. Can JVM survive in a cloud environment? Is JIT still useful? What tools can we improve using the AOT? How can we lower the memory footprint in JIT?
0 kommentar(er)
